Comments on: consensus.art http://www.xradiograph.com/interference/2007/05/07/consensusart/ like a delicate tracery of veins on a vaccum-tube Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:06:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: the Other michael http://www.xradiograph.com/interference/2007/05/07/consensusart/#comment-121939 the Other michael Wed, 16 May 2007 19:47:17 +0000 http://www.xradiograph.com/interference/2007/05/07/consensusart/#comment-121939 There was a very interesting point of shift pointed in one of the linked articles: at some point, wikipedia switched from "writing an encyclopedia on the internet" to "being an encyclopedia on the internet." And therein lies the rub of the wrong way. There was a very interesting point of shift pointed in one of the linked articles: at some point, wikipedia switched from “writing an encyclopedia on the internet” to “being an encyclopedia on the internet.”

And therein lies the rub of the wrong way.

]]> By: Bwana http://www.xradiograph.com/interference/2007/05/07/consensusart/#comment-121422 Bwana Fri, 11 May 2007 09:51:03 +0000 http://www.xradiograph.com/interference/2007/05/07/consensusart/#comment-121422 I gotta say, that tone is unctuous, but not nearly as annoying as supertexted "[citation needed]" every time something that isn't 100% common knowledge is present on a page. "In basic math, '2 + 2 = 4' [citation needed]" -GAHHHH! I gotta say, that tone is unctuous, but not nearly as annoying as supertexted “[citation needed]” every time something that isn’t 100% common knowledge is present on a page. “In basic math, ‘2 + 2 = 4′ [citation needed]” -GAHHHH!

]]>